30 Brands That Use Animal Testing, Their Products, and Avoiding Them
There are many reasons why makeup, personal care or even clothing brands test on animals (...)
Why do brands test on animals?
There are many reasons why makeup, personal care or even clothing brands test on animals ; However, if a brand tests on animals, it means that its practices are considered not very humane; Maybe you want to know which products are tested on animals.
In the list of brands that test on animals there are large emporiums, cosmetic brands and companies where most of the products are for personal care, but one of the current concerns is to distinguish which ones are to find a cruelty-free alternative .
Which brands test on animals and why aren't they cruelty free?
Animal testing has been a widely used practice for many years, and most large companies have resorted to this practice because they want to check the quality of their products in a way that is safe for humans.
Today, the list of companies that adhere to the cruelty free philosophy grows longer, that do not use animals to check the quality of products that are considered essential, and that are completely free of cruelty. Here are some companies that still test on animals:
There is still a long way to go before Always becomes a cruelty-free brand. This can be due to several reasons; for example, the fact that it sells its products in China, where animal testing is required by law to verify product quality.
Always is a personal care company on which the hygiene and comfort of many women depend; however, it should not be overlooked that it is one of the top companies on the list of companies that test on animals.
In short, Amway uses animals in its production processes; This is a multi-level company that specializes in selling cosmetics, skin care, hair care, and body care, as well as offering fragrances that have required animal testing to hit the market.
The Amway brand is well-recognized around the world, but the products it sells are listed as Merchandise Tested on Animals to make sure they won't cause an adverse reaction in humans. humans.
Avon is one of the largest companies in the world, but like Always, its production line and market are also in China, so that it would be difficult for it to become a cruelty-free company, at least in the near future.
Avon may not be on the cruelty-free list, but it ranks as one of the big companies that could take it upon themselves to at least try to stick to the cruelty-free philosophy in certain areas.
Brands that test on animals are not necessarily those that specialize in basic necessities, and Balenciaga is the perfect example of a company that tests on animals to get the market their products, in this case, their fragrances.
Most specialty fragrance companies test on animals for adverse reactions to understand what the risks are, if any, in launching a given product.
Bic is a company known for its basic and miscellaneous products. In this case, Bic is among the brands that are not recommended, since they are still a long way from being considered 'cruelty free', especially when it comes to razors.
This is one of the personal care brands that set a clear example of animal cruelty, and multiple organizations in favor of a cruelty free culture have advocated for a change in Bic's practice; however, up to now some of their practices have not been prevented.
Bobbi Brown is a successful makeup company, perhaps one of the most successful makeup brands in the world. Like fragrances, creams, and other personal care products, Bobbi Brown offers a makeup line that requires animal testing.
In theory, this brand could be considered cruelty-free; However, its production line and the scope of its products in the Asian market, specifically in China, for example, have meant that animal tests are practically necessary.
Although Calvin Klein's line of products is extensive and some of them are cruelty free, the company's fragrances and makeup line are on the list of companies that still test on animals to verify the efficacy of their products .
Brands that test on animals aren't always small or essential companies; in fact, Calvin Klein is one of the top-earning brands and offers the most luxury products, which raises the question of whether it is still necessary to retain some of the current practices.
For a company to be included in the list of cruelty-free brands, it is necessary that they meet at least three requirements, among which are: that the brand does not test their products or their ingredients on animals.
Furthermore, they should also not allow a third-party brand to test for harm on animals on their behalf, or sell their products in a country where brands are required by law to continue these practices, so even if a company claims to be cruelty free, the ideal is to find out in depth.
Dior's fragrances, makeup and personal care line have one thing in common: they all test on animals, even though they are among the budget-conscious brands, which makes assume that, in your current and future production line, you do not contemplate abandoning this practice.
Once again, the factor that works the most against Dior in cementing itself as a cruelty-free company is that they do business in China; therefore, it will continue to be among the brands that test on animals, even if it is not by choice.
Will Estée Lauder ever enter cruelty free brands? Probably yes, and it is that the brand has promised to eliminate the exploitation of animals, which currently serve as a means to confirm that the products they sell are suitable for human consumption.
Therefore, it is possible that very soon the practice of testing products on animals will be completely eradicated, giving way to Estée Lauder joining the select group of cruelty free companies in the world.
PETA has spoken out to make it clear that Gillette does test on animals, and is among the brands consumers should avoid; however, this is complicated in a market in which some goods and services are essential.
A list has already been made of all the brands that test on animals, with the aim of demanding that the authorities stop the exploitation of animals, which represents the opportunity to open new doors and opportunities towards the adoption of better techniques of production.
John Frieda is a company that has some factors against being 100% cruelty free: not only does it sell its products in China, but it is forced to test on animals for legal reasons, although it is known that its ingredients are not tested on animals.
If animal testing is required by law, John Frieda may not be able to do much about animal protection, but the fact that this is a subsidiary of Kao, a company known for testing on animals, makes it that the road to animal care is bleak.
L'Óreal is not completely cruelty free, but it is among the brands that have strived to take steps towards adopting a cruelty-free philosophy. Of all the makeup companies that make up this list, this is one that has taken great care in all processes.
Since 1989, LOreal adopted a series of steps to minimize animal testing, so they do not carry out tests that could be considered harmful to them, always guaranteeing that the quality of their beauty products does not decline.
Lacoste fragrances, like many others, rely on animal testing to carry out their production, which is why it is among the brands that still rely on this ancient practice. Lacoste tests on animals and it is a brand that seems not to adopt a cruelty free philosophy in its processes.
The fact that Lacoste is recognized for being among the brands that test on animals has certainly not contributed to its popularity, especially among the vegan community and the protectors of animal rights.
No, Lysol, despite being one of the most used products, is not cruelty free. Perhaps what makes its consumption essential for personal care and for keeping spaces clean is its effectiveness, but it will be difficult to find Lysol among companies that do not test on animals.
As a brand, animal-based testing may be required on most, but not all, of the variety of products they offer. There may be some options on the market that do not test on animals, information that can be found on their website.
Of the cosmetic companies that make up this list, MAC is one of the most famous and successful, but that does not mean that they are classified as cruelty free. Resorting to makeup brands that test on animals is increasingly seen as a negative option.
If it's cruelty-free makeup you're looking for, then you might want to look at other markets. It is possible to find brands that do not test on animals, but PETA, on its website, has been in charge of evidencing the animal tests carried out by MAC.
Nivea cannot be missing from this list of companies that test on animals. Its personal care line is within the market for brands that are not characterized by care for the environment or animals.
This has been brought to the attention of PETA, which has already declared among its intentions to verify that Nivea tests on animals and that it will not hesitate to demand that it allocate a part of its budget to care for the environment and the production processes that performed.
Mary Kay is a makeup brand that stands out for its multi-level sales and for being liked by a large part of the public. On their website, they indicate that their philosophy is cruelty-free with the environment and with animals, but it is not yet considered cruelty free.
This is because both their skin care line and makeup and fragrances require, in some cases, to guarantee that the manufacture of each product adheres to the laws of certain countries; Thus, Mary Kay continues to be among the companies that test on animals.
Palmolive is a brand that can be found in almost every corner of the world, or at least in America. The bad news is that it is not yet free of animal cruelty, but the positive side is that, although they test on animals, they are taking more and more steps towards being classified as cruelty free.
In recent years, Palmolive, a company specializing in personal care products, has made a commitment to stop testing on animals to show a more humane side to its processes and be listed as a company with cruelty-free processes.
Once again, this is because many of Rexona's products are either made or sold in China; Faced with this situation, their hands are practically tied, since being a personal care line, they are in great demand throughout the world.
Wet n Wild
Perhaps Wet n Wild is one of the cosmetic brands that have put the most care in the search for 100% cruelty free certification. On their website, they claim that they do not test on animals and that they do not intend to engage in this practice.
Thus, they have been very careful to proceed in a legal, ecological and animal-friendly manner; Thus, on this occasion, Wet n Wild could be considered as a company that has taken special care and dedication in adopting a cruelty free philosophy.
No, Unilever is not cruelty free. Although it is one of the most important companies in the world, it has not yet reached the point where it is considered among the cruelty-free companies. This could be for many reasons, primarily the reach of your market.
Of all the brands that make up this list, Unilever is one of the most present in the world, so it is not surprising that some countries require it to carry out tests on animals to comply with specific laws that are intended to benefit the final consumers.
Like other products of the same type, Vera Wang continues to be one of the companies that tests on animals, so although her line of dresses is cruelty-free, it is very possible that she is far from consecrated as a Entirely cruelty free company.
Yves Saint Laurent
With great care, Yves Saint Laurent has been very careful in his statements and has avoided giving many details to confirm whether they test on animals or are a cruelty free company; however, some websites have come up with key information that puts the company in the spotlight.
Specialized in beauty and personal care products, Yves Saint Laurent continues to use animal tests, so they are far from being part of the select group of companies that have adopted the cruelty-free philosophy.
Another major personal care company is Yves Rocher, and although they have stated that they have not tested on animals since 1989, the evidence that has come to light indicates otherwise. And it's not that Yves Rocher is a company that doesn't adapt to change, but that its business relationships don't favor the adoption of a cruelty-free culture.
Thus, even if the company says otherwise, when selling its products in China it can ensure that it is among those brands that test on animals, so it is very possible that its products remain within this production line.
According to PETA, one of Victoria's Secret's best kept secrets is that they still test on animals, despite being so popular with the world public . Although clothing is among the brand's specialties, they also sell other types of products.
Among these are creams and fragrances that usually require animal testing as part of their manufacturing process. So far, the company does not seem to have ruled on the matter, so the question remains: Will the company one day be able to be classified as cruelty free?
According to PETA, Sensodyne is on the list of companies related to oral hygiene care that still test on animals; the general invitation has directed the public to avoid its use and consumption, but is this possible?
Sensodyne may not be cruelty-free, but it does offer a line of specialty and all-ages oral care products, so animal testing might stick around for a while longer.
Procter Gamble claims to be a cruelty free company; According to its website, for some years now Procter Gamble has stopped testing on animals, but that does not mean that it can be considered cruelty free.
Having part of its production chain in China, Procter Gamble must ensure that it follows the laws set forth by that country, and although it has ensured that it adheres to cruelty-free standards, the reality is that Procter Gamble is still far from reaching 100% % that category.
Like Procter Gamble, Ponds has found himself in the spotlight, both declaring information on his site and doing contrary practices in real life. Both Procter Gamble and Ponds have stuck to a cruelty free philosophy on paper, but is that really the case?
Although they claim otherwise, Ponds is still classified as a company that tests on animals, and this is because, outside the United States, its production costs are reduced, but so is its autonomy to be 100% cruelty free.
Oral B joins Sensodyne and Colgate as an oral care brand that continues the practice of using animals to regulate how its products work; For now, they have guaranteed to stop animal testing in most countries.
If you have any questions or want to confirm which of your favorite brands are free of animal cruelty, just do a quick search on the internet, where you will also find the possible replacements that you could choose to contribute to the care of animals.